Received: by maskin (mbox dlanor)
 (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Thu Apr  8 05:14:18 1999)
X-From_: owner-stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk Thu Apr  8 01:41:11 1999
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by maskin.ettnet.se (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id BAA08097
	for <dlanor@oden.se>; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 01:41:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from UNKNOWN(194.247.47.34), claiming to be "spodden.zetnet.co.uk"
 via SMTP by maskin, id smtpdAAAa001yN; Thu Apr  8 01:41:01 1999
Received: from majordom by spodden.zetnet.co.uk with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 10V1ur-0008C9-00; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 00:39:29 +0100
Received: from bespin.worldnet.net [195.3.3.4] 
	by spodden.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 10V1uo-0008C0-00; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 00:39:26 +0100
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wn16-166.paris.worldnet.fr [195.3.16.166])
	by Bespin.worldnet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA13679
	for <stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk>; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 01:37:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 01:37:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199904072337.BAA13679@Bespin.worldnet.net>
To: stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk
From: res1@vcf-com.fr (Olivier Booklage)
Organization: vcf-com.fr
Subject: Re: patched STinG TCP beta 1.18 release
X-Mailer: NEWSie Version 0.94 (Atari)
Sender: owner-stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk
X-Loop: stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stik-beta-testers@list.zetnet.co.uk

>This TCP patch was fixed as follows:
>------------------------------------
>As Olivier was early to report, the TCP beta 1.17 did improve the closing
>negotiation a lot, sufficiently to eliminate most server problems.

Good job, I have just notice that with 	handle = TCP_open(INADDR_LOOPBACK, 
80, 0, 500 ); + TCP_close() without server, the CIB stay, and handle is 
positive.

So I think that is TCP_open problem because it never return E_REFUSE,
the memory is released only if TCP_wait_state(TESTABLISH) is called and
return something != E_TIMEOUT ( any contact with the remote stack ).


Resume:
------

Remnant in case of TCP_open()+TCP_close() if TCP_wait_state() is E_TIMEOUT.

Is your opignion?

Regards,
Olivier.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Boulogne Billancourt FRANCE
Email   : res1@vcf-com.fr
HomePage: http://services.worldnet.net/vcf-com/olivier.htm (194.2.128.248)
CabOvl  : http://194.2.128.248/vcf-com/download/cabovl.lzh
WebLight: http://194.2.128.248/vcf-com/download/weblight.lzh

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail Majordomo@list.zetnet.co.uk
with the body of the message containing "unsubscribe Stik-Beta-Testers"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

.
